Goat Funded Trader vs TradingFunds

Incorporation 🏁
Goat Funded Trader
May 2023
TradingFunds
February 2023
Pros ✅
Goat Funded Trader
- Capital allocation up to $800,000 with 75% to 95% profit share. - Flexible leverage up to 1:100 and diverse trading instruments. - Two unique funding programs and time-unlimited evaluation. - Realistic profit goals (8% & 5%) with overnight/weekend trading. - News trading allowed with an efficiently designed user interface.
TradingFunds
- Impressive Trustpilot rating of 4.3/5. - Single-step evaluation with 1:10 to 1:100 leverage. - Profit sharing of 80% to 90%. - Flexible trading: overnight, weekends, and during news events. - Unrestricted trading strategy.
Cons ❌
Goat Funded Trader
- Newer prop firm - Limited community feedback - Absence of a scaling plan
TradingFunds
- Elevated evaluation account fees - Trailing Drawdown - Starting leverage at a low of 1:10 - 2% Maximum stop-loss for each instrument
Rules 📋
Goat Funded Trader
Maximum Daily Loss, Maximum Loss, Maximum Trading Days, Minimum Trading Days, Profit Target, Third Party Copy Trading Risk, Third Party EA Risk
TradingFunds
Maximum Trailing Drawdown, Profit Target, Stop Loss Required, Third Party Copy Trading Risk, Third Party EA Risk
Deposit 🏧
Goat Funded Trader
Credit/debit cards, Crypto
TradingFunds
Crypto, Credit/debit cards, PayPal
Withdrawal 💰
Goat Funded Trader
Deel
TradingFunds
Crypto, Deel, Paypal
Account Size 🪙
Goat Funded Trader
"$100,000 USD", "$15,000 USD", "$200,000 USD", "$25,000 USD", "$50,000 USD", "$8,000 USD"
TradingFunds
"$100,000 USD", "$200,000 USD", "$25,000 USD", "$50,000 USD"
Instruments 📈
Goat Funded Trader
Commodities, Crypto, Forex, Indices, Metals, Stocks
TradingFunds
Commodities, Crypto, Forex, Indices, Metals
Currencies 💱
Goat Funded Trader
USD
TradingFunds
USD

Goat Funded Trader Overview

Goat Funded Trader positions itself as a go-to prop firm for serious traders aiming at high-capital allocation. With up to $800,000 available, it caters to the ambitious retail trader looking for significant profit opportunities, offering a generous profit share between 75% and 95% based on the trader’s performance. Diverse trading instruments and flexible leverage up to an impressive 1:100 are major draws, supporting traders who thrive on variety and high-risk, high-reward strategies. Unique to Goat Funded Trader are the two funding programs that it offers, which don't put traders under pressure with time-restricted evaluations. Their realistic profit goals of 8% and 5% for different programs seem attainable and are complemented by the ability to hold positions overnight and over the weekend, in addition to the permission to trade during news events. The user interface of the platform is touted for its efficiency, potentially reducing friction in trade execution. However, Goat Funded Trader may pose some challenges due to its rules – Maximum Daily Loss, Maximum Loss, Maximum Trading Days, Minimum Trading Days, Profit Target, and risks associated with Third Party Copy Trading and EA (Expert Advisor) usage. Deposits and withdrawals may also be limited for some users, as they are processed using credit/debit cards, crypto, and Deel, respectively.

TradingFunds Synopsis

TradingFunds commands attention with an impressive Trustpilot rating of 4.3 out of 5. This high rating suggests a positive consensus from its user base and can be a strong indicator of credibility and client satisfaction. Like Goat Funded Trader, TradingFunds offers a reasonable profit share of 80% to 90%, leaning towards rewarding successful traders well. A notable differentiator for TradingFunds is its simplified single-step evaluation process, which may appeal to those who like straightforward access to funding. It, too, offers flexible trading conditions, including overnight and weekend positions, and no restrictions on trading during news events. Additionally, there are no restrictions on the trading strategy, which can be a significant boon for traders with unique or unconventional approaches. On the downside, the firm's elevated account fees for evaluation can be off-putting for some traders. The trading environment is further constrained by a trailing drawdown rule and a 2% maximum stop-loss per instrument, potentially affecting risk management strategies. Starting leverage as low as 1:10 may also be less attractive to traders who prefer or are accustomed to higher leverage from the get-go. To its advantage, TradingFunds is more flexible with its deposit and withdrawal methods, adding PayPal to the mix alongside crypto and credit/debit cards. Withdrawals can be made through Crypto, Deel, and PayPal, offering more options to access funds.

Account Offering Comparison

Both firms operate with USD as the account currency and cater to a wide range of tradable instruments. Goat Funded Trader edges ahead in terms of the variety of account sizes and includes stocks in its list of tradable instruments – a feature not offered by TradingFunds.

Operational Standpoints

In terms of operations, both firms are relatively new with Goat Funded Trader incorporated in May 2023, and TradingFunds in February 2023. This roughly equivalent newcomer status suggests that both might still be winning trader loyalties and shaping their offerings to market demands—however, the slight head start by TradingFunds and its Trustpilot rating point to a firm that has quickly established a strong base.

Unique Selling Propositions for Traders

In the competitive space of prop trading, both Goat Funded Trader and TradingFunds present compelling offerings for retail traders. The choice between them primarily hinges on the trader's preference for capital allocation potential over user ratings, the variety of account types, available trading instruments, and the specifics of the trading terms and conditions, including evaluation processes, account fees, and funding rules. While Goat Funded Trader’s high capital offer and flexible leverage are impressive, traders must carefully consider the trade-offs, such as specific rules that can influence trading style. Conversely, TradingFunds’ popularity and trader-friendly evaluation process present an attractive proposition, though its higher evaluation fees and drawdown management may not align with everyone's risk appetite. In essence, each firm has carved out a niche that will suit different trader profiles, and the decision rests with individual preferences, trading strategies, and risk management philosophies.